Wisdom’s Friend and the Whole World’s Enemy? Philosophy with, in and against the World [in German]

Abstract

How is philosophical knowledge related to the world in which it is produced—and how should it be related? In the article, “world” refers to the whole of historically established, politically contested and materially constituted practices. Three ideal-type relationships are distinguished: affirmatively in the world, negatively against the world, and with the world. The article argues for the latter because it combines the two decisive insights of the first two relationships: the insight into philosophy’s facticity, i.e., it being bound to the world, and the insight into philosophy’s freedom, i.e., that nevertheless it can turn against that world. Political epistemology is needed to explicate any philosophy with the world because it holds together, in a productive tension, minimal materialism as the core of the insight into philosophy’s facticity and the irreducibility of thought as the core of the insight into philosophy’s freedom.